Internal business tool
$6,000-$14,000A focused operational workflow, secure access, core records, reporting and production deployment.
Interactive web application cost planner
Estimate the cost of an internal tool, SaaS MVP, custom CRM, ERP or another web application using product scope, roles, workflows and integrations.
Your planning range
Useful starting points
These are broad bands for custom production software. The estimator narrows them using the product decisions that create the most engineering and delivery work.
A focused operational workflow, secure access, core records, reporting and production deployment.
A focused sellable product with custom UX, organisations, subscriptions and a dependable backend.
Customer records, sales pipelines, communication history, reporting and workflows shaped around the team.
Connected inventory, orders, finance or operational processes with multiple roles and integrations.
What changes the cost
The expensive part is often the interaction between users, business rules, data and external systems. A disciplined first release keeps those decisions visible and deliberate.
Defining the smallest valuable release and a foundation that will not block its next stage.
Permissions, approvals, state changes, exceptions and audit history multiply implementation paths.
External APIs, migration quality, synchronisation and ownership rules introduce hidden risk.
Security, testing, monitoring, accessibility, deployment and recovery are part of dependable software.
Before you estimate
A useful range explains its assumptions while leaving room for technical details that can only be validated against the real product.
No. It is a planning range based on the product shape, workflows, access model, design and capabilities you select. A proposal requires a technical review and an agreed first-release scope.
A first release normally includes product discovery, UX and interface work where required, frontend and backend development, core integrations, testing, deployment and a practical handover. The exact mix depends on your answers.
Each role, permission, state change and exception creates behaviour that must be designed, secured, implemented and tested. Ten simple screens can require less work than one dense operational workflow.
Yes. Existing applications usually begin with a code, architecture and data review. The useful parts can be retained while fragile areas are stabilised, replaced or migrated in controlled stages.
No. Cloud infrastructure, model usage, payment processing, paid APIs, licences and other external services are billed separately unless a later proposal explicitly includes them.
Yes, and that is often the safest approach. A focused first release can validate the highest-value workflow while lower-priority modules remain clearly planned for later.
Keep the range for planning with no obligation. If it fits, reply with your current specification, prototype or application URL and I will identify the most useful next step.
Start with a realistic planning number
Describe the product, receive the assumptions and decide whether the range fits before starting a sales conversation.
Build my estimate